Posted 9th May 2021 | 3 Comments
DfT confirms cracks as Intercity Express disruption continues
CRACKS have been confirmed in the chassis of a number of Hitachi-built Intercity Expresses, and serious disruption is continuing on intercity routes as emergency checks are carried out. It is not clear how many faults have been found, and some trains are returning to service.
Hitachi said: ‘Inspection has identified cracks on the lifting points under the carriage of some Class 800 trains overnight.’
Services on GWR and LNER are now those mainly affected by the mass withdrawals, and both companies are urging their passengers not to try to travel today on their intercity routes. The situation is worse north of the border, where industrial action on ScotRail is also causing cancellations.
Transpennine Express says it is able to begin reintroducing its Nova 1 trains, which are Intercity Expresses, between Newcastle and York, but that some disruption is still possible, while Hull Trains says its services have returned to normal.
Rail minister Chris Heaton-Harris is calling for a ‘rapid and comprehensive review’.
He said: ‘Routine checks of Hitachi trains identified cracks on part of the chassis of some trains. Safety is always our absolute priority, so these trains have been taken off the network to undergo full and rigorous checks.
‘Hitachi are working to complete these strict precautionary checks. Trains will be returned to service as quickly as possible once they are fully approved as safe by the manufacturer.
‘Whilst some trains are starting to be reintroduced, disruption is likely for a prolonged period, particularly on GWR.
‘I share the frustration of passengers who are experiencing significant disruption, and would ask people whose journeys are affected to check before travelling.’
Hitachi Rail CEO Andrew Barr told the BBC that the decision to withdraw the trains had been taken because of cracks found on the metal that linked the train's body ‘with the underside’.
Anonymous industry sources have been providing more details, although these remain unconfirmed. One said: ‘The issue is reported to be around metal fatigues, either in the welding or the actual components.’
Reader Comments:
Views expressed in submitted comments are that of the author, and not necessarily shared by Railnews.
Matthew Ellis, Woking
While there are likely to be questions that need answering about whether these cracks could have been predicted/avoided, the more important issue just now is good customer communication.
So don't just say 'don't travel', but to say (e.g.) 'we have checked x number of trains and have y still to check with z requiring repairs' and give an idea of when services will resume.
david c smith, Bletchley
Is this latest problem another example of government procurement failures ? Class 800's have already upset some because of hard, uncomfortable seating.
No, I'm not wanting "minimum government", but their role should , perhaps move away from "command and control", towards incentivisation. Leave the decision making to the rail professionals , but give them a framework of incentive subsidies and charges to represent "hidden" costs and benefits.
steven Jolley, Macclesfield
Why are the 91s/ MK4s & HSTs not out of cold storage ! Even some 90s & Mk3 sets.
[Sounds easy, but it isn't. Trains stabled for months cannot by pushed straight back into service without numerous checks, which would themselves take some time. In addition, there could be questions about whether drivers (and other train crew) were signed up to date to work these older types. (Some of the newest drivers might have qualified after HSTs had gone, for example.) However, LNER has managed to put two IC225s back into service. I suspect these were only withdrawn recently.--Ed.]