Posted 8th November 2022 | 4 Comments
Damage to Rutland bridge set to cause weeks of disruption
A bridge in Rutland was so seriously damaged by a lorry on 5 November that the railway may be closed between Leicester and Peterborough for the next three weeks, Replacement buses are running and freight trains carrying essential goods are being diverted via London. Fosters Bridge at Ketton crosses the A6121, which will also be closed until repairs can be completed.
Trains return ++ More trains are running today after the cancellation of three 24-hour RMT strikes at the eleventh hour on Friday afternoon. Train operators were unable to change the rosters for thousands of drivers and other train crew immediately, and timetables are slowly returning to normal day by day. The strikes would have been staged on Saturday, Monday and tomorrow, and ‘intense negotiations’ between the RMT, Network Rail and train operators are now underway. The union has also warned that more strikes may be called unless there is a settlement, and a ballot of its members authorising fresh walkouts until April closes a week today.
Metro expansion ++ Transport North East has set out a business case for an extension of the Tyne & Wear Metro which would give Washington a rail connection and also be the start of reinstating the Leamside line. The Washington Metro Loop would include new stations at Follingsby, Washington North and Washington South. The scheme would cost £745 million, and TNE said the trains would replace 1.7 million car journeys a year.
Reader Comments:
Views expressed in submitted comments are that of the author, and not necessarily shared by Railnews.
Greg T, London
WHY are the wreckers who do this damage not being sued or beiung made to pay via their insurers?
This is madness
Neil Palmer, Waterloo
It appears from this Network Rail page (if Ed. will permit the link - I've separated it so you'll have to piece it together) that this is all on the taxpayer. Seems ridiculous that they don't follow up to recoup the cost from vehicle drivers/owners/insurers. Are they just too lazy to do it?
w w w networkrail co uk / stories / delays-explained-bridge-strikes/
H.Gillies-Smith, South Milford
In my days when BR was in charge a claim would have been made against the owners insurance. I see no reason why this is not continued through but you'll have to ask Network Rail to comfirm.
Neil Palmer, Waterloo
Bridge Bashing
So is the idiot driver/the lorry's owner/insurance company responsible for the full cost of this, or is it on Network Rail (i.e. the taxpayer) to pay for these incompetent drivers?