Posted 19th July 2023 | 4 Comments
Welcome for fresh possibility of taking HS2 services to Leeds
A new two-year study of ways of taking HS2 services to Leeds has been welcomed in the Midlands.
The study will consider future rail capacity needs at Leeds and in West Yorkshire more generally, and will look at different options, taking possible disruption and value for money into account.
Leeds had been intended to be the terminus of a new high speed line from the West Midlands, which would have served the Derby/Nottingham area and Sheffield en route, but this part of the scheme was later cut back to terminate at East Midlands Parkway.
The government, which says the technical work will be done by Network Rail, supported by HS2 Ltd, warned that the preparation of an Outline Business Case did not mean that any of the options would go ahead.
These options include running high speed services via Newark and the East Coast Main Line, routing Leeds services via Manchester, or completing the full Eastern Leg of HS2 through the East Midlands and South Yorkshire to Leeds as originally planned.
The study will also examine the implications of using parts of the existing network.
Rail minister Huw Merriman told MPs: ‘The proposals set out in the Integrated Rail Plan bring communities and labour markets together and will support growing our economy in towns and cities across the nation.
‘The work in the study will consider a range of options and take account of value for money, affordability, deliverability and timescales, economic development, disruption to passengers and local views and evidence. The study will be extensive and will take two years to complete.
‘As this work progresses, we intend to review the case for dropping certain options, taking account of evidence gathered, particularly on costs, affordability, benefits and value for money.’
Another development concerns the provision of a new station for Bradford, which had been dropped from the separate Integrated Rail Plan.
Mr Merriman said the government was accepting a recommendation of the Transport Select Committee that ‘the government should reconsider the case for the development of a new station in Bradford. The development of the St James’s Market station would not only enhance rail connectivity in the North, allowing further investment in the city, but also provide further opportunities for rail development in Bradford after the “core pipeline” of IRP upgrades take place.’
Midlands Connect’s chief executive Maria Machancoses said: ‘We welcome the release of the much awaited terms of reference for the HS2 review up to Leeds.
‘Midlands Connect remains unanimous on the enormous economic, social and environmental benefits associated with getting HS2 connections from the Midlands to the North.
‘We will now seek to be actively involved in the next stages of development ensuring as part of the study, consideration is given to our proposals for improved services from the East Midlands to Leeds and beyond.’
Reader Comments:
Views expressed in submitted comments are that of the author, and not necessarily shared by Railnews.
Neil Palmer, Waterloo
With HS2 cut back to end at the East Midlands hub the projected journey time to Leeds is only 20 minutes quicker than via Kings Cross/ECML today. And with that you get to watch 64 miles of the inside of tunnel walls from your window. Now add in the extra time to travel out to Old Oak Common thanks to the government decision that will INCREASE costs by delaying construction of the Euston (which should have been an underground through station, but that's another story) to Old Oak Common section for (at least) 2 years and there will be hardly anyone who'd want to use HS2 to get to Leeds anyway. If there was anyone with common sense in charge of HS2 the London to Old Oak Common section shoudl have continued, along with a replacement for the Golborne Link, and the Birmingham Interchange to East Midlands hub section delayed (or cancelled) instead.
david C smith, Bletchley
I have to say, again, something pointed out before. Leeds is 189 miles north of King's Cross, whilst Manchester is the same mileage from Euston. 189 miles can be covered already in just over 2hours on either route, and with ERTMS type signalling, this could come down below 2 hours.
Experience around the world indicates that journeys under 2 1/2 hours usually are competitive with aviation , and allow day - returns, with 80+% market share ,whilst those over 3 1/2 hours can only acheive around 30% market share.
Applied to GB, this means that the greatest "payback" would come from London to Teesside / Tyneside / Sunderland / Edinburgh / Glasgow, all seeming to imply an HS2 following an East Coast alignment. West Yorks.would also get minor benefit, with no significant extra costs.
Neil Palmer, Waterloo
I smell a cunning plan intended to kick this decision 2 years down the road when the present government won't have to deal with it.
Andrew Gwilt, Thundersley Essex
Is that what the HS2 Eastern Leg was supposed to go to Leeds and for Leeds to have a new HS2 station next to Leeds City station. And of course a new HS2 station at Toton, Nottinghamshire (close to the Derbyshire border) that would serve Nottingham, Derby and nearby East Midlands International Airport.