Posted 8th October 2024 | 3 Comments

Fate of HS2 to Euston could be known within weeks

Transport secretary Louise Haigh has raised hopes that the high speed link between Old Oak Common and London Euston could be back on the agenda.

She told the BBC that an announcement about the Euston section could be included in the budget speech on 30 October.

Ms Haigh said: ‘‘It would make absolutely no sense to build a £66 billion high-speed line between Old Oak Common and Birmingham. Even under the previous government’s chopped and changed and discredited plans for HS2, Euston was always going to be part of the solution.’

Meanwhile, Ms Haigh has been advised by the High Speed Rail Group that completing HS2 to Euston and also restoring the section between the West Midlands and Crewe, for which land has already been bought, could make the line much more valuable to a potential concession-holder.

The Group, which includes major contractors like Hitachi, Alstom and Siemens and is supported by the high speed rail lobby group Greengauge21, says the full route could be worth £20 billion to a leaseholder, but much less if the line only connects Old Oak Common with Birmingham, and that the difference could more than pay for the Euston section.

HS1 is already leased to a consortium of investors until 2040, although the Government is the ground landlord and the line itself has not been sold. A similar arrangement for HS2 could appeal to the Treasury. 

The work at Old Oak Common towards Euston is currently on hold, pending a decision about the future of the link, but two tunnel boring machines have already arrived from Germany.

HSRG chair Dyan Perry is quoted by the Guardian as saying: ‘Short-term decisions to cut investment into infrastructure would be deeply damaging to the UK, creating uncertainty and jeopardising investor confidence.

’We strongly urge Treasury officials to carefully consider our recommendations and take action to ensure the UK can fully realise the benefits of a connected rail network.’

Meanwhile, Network Rail has announced a five-point plan to improve the present Euston, which was opened in 1969 but is now handling many more passengers than for which it was designed, leading to overcrowding. Performance problems on the West Coast Main Line can make matters worse, and one of Network Rail’s priorities is to improve the route.

The other four are a review of passenger information displays, better messages to passengers when trains are ready for boarding, increasing the amount of space on the concourse and easing pinch-points, and making sure that the various parties who contribute to the functioning of Euston work together more effectively.

Overhead advertising boards have already been switched off, while their future is assessed.

Network Rail West Coast South route director Gary Walsh said: ‘Our five-point plan will help improve things for passengers in the short term by creating more space, providing better passenger information, and working as an industry to improve the reliability of train services on the West Coast Main Line.’

Reader Comments:

Views expressed in submitted comments are that of the author, and not necessarily shared by Railnews.

  • david C smith, Bletchley

    Yes, agreed that a solution to the West Coast capacity problem is needed. The WCML is in many respects two different railways joined end to end - a high occupancy , intensive timetable system joined to an equal length of long distance line with few, if any significant "under 200 mile" intercity needs. So a capacity relief parralell to the current WCML at least up as far as Crewe seems to make sense, even if built to a more modest standard than expensive 225 mph.

    Might it make sense to lookt to the application of two or three "cut offs" with maximmum of between 150 and 180 mph , designed to enable the Scottish Central Belt to be reached in around 3 hours from London , via an enhanced ECML, bringing extra benefit too to more connurbations such as Tyneside / Teesside / W . Yorkshire / E. Yorkshire ? A BR civil engineer once pointed out to me the high cost of high speeds between Carnforth and Carstairs.

  • Chris Jones-Bridger, Buckley Flintshire

    As the recent BBC Panorama programme exposed even a former Transport Sec & Chancellor admitted that at the crucial time HS2 was being discussed in Parliament the then government were being polite distracted by the noise generated around Brexit. Add to that the political theatre around Mr Sunak's unilateral HS2 decisions and further unnecessary cost has been added to the bill.

    Unravelling this poisoned inheritance is now the new government's challenge. In reality restarting the Euston works is no brainer especially as the OOC to Euston tunnel boring is mission critical and tunnelling machines are ready to roll. As recent adverse publicity has highlighted Euston is currently a blighted mess. Concourse overcrowding is the most visible symptom of the fragility of the infrastructure and the operational plan. West Coast route mod is two decades old. The many operating constraints remaining make today's increasingly congested mixed use route challenging. As the proposers of HS2 originally identified a new route would segregate the capacity hungery Intercity services without another costly and disruptive rebuild of the existing and increasing fragile 200 year old infrastructure.

  • James Dawkins, Farnborough

    Excellent. Time to reinstate to northern branches too, and build the network in full.

Have Your Say

Please read Guidance Notes for Contributors

Submitted comments are subject to approval prior to public posting. Railnews reserve the right to reject, alter or censor any submissions. Railnews also reserve the right to reproduce submissions in any format.

Railnews may, from time to time, send out marketing emails to subscribers and website users. If you would prefer not to receive these emails, please tick this box.