Posted 17th December 2024 | 4 Comments
Welcome for railway devolution plans
The charity Campaign for Better Transport has welcomed the Government’s plans to devolve more responsibility for train services to the English regions.
A new White Paper says: ‘Mayors will be given a statutory role in governing, managing, planning and developing the rail network. In addition to partnerships with Great British Railways, Mayors of Established Mayoral Strategic Authorities will have a clear right to request greater devolution of services, infrastructure and station control where it would support a more integrated network.’
Silviya Barrett from the CBT said: ‘This is a model that has worked well in London and Liverpool and enables local leaders to deliver the services that work for their communities.
‘We’re equally pleased that Great British Railways will facilitate the expansion of multi-modal, integrated ticketing across city regions. This needs to be a part of wider fares and ticketing reform to ensure passenger across the country benefit from simpler and better value fares.
‘We are pleased to see the move to multi-year funding settlements and the re-introduction of Local Transport Plans, which will provide much-needed certainty. To be successful in delivering sustainable transport networks that work for local areas, transport funding should be linked to levels of improvements required to create the modal shift needed to meet national carbon reduction objectives.’
The Railway Industry Association, which represents suppliers, has also welcomed the plans.
RIA chief executive Darren Caplan said: ‘RIA’s Nations & Regions network already has close relationships with Combined Authorities around the country, and so we look forward to continuing to work closely with the Metro Mayors as they take on a new statutory role in governing, managing, planning and developing their local and regional rail networks.’
Reader Comments:
Views expressed in submitted comments are that of the author, and not necessarily shared by Railnews.
david C smith, Bletchley
It seems there are some localised transport setups that are a success, and others that aren't . I would hope the people who are responsible for the latter can be replaced through democratic process.
There have been several people over the years who have pointed out the investment going into the London area, and the simultaneous starving the Midlands and North . At least there are people like the Mayor of Manchester who are fighting to get their "fair share".
Ian, Hull
Yeah great, loads of little Balkan States keeping within their borders at the expense of regional and inter-city routes. How has funding these tin pot dictators worked out for passengers in Oldham, Chester, Northwich, Knutsford, Wigan etc (all of whom suffer inferior rail services as a result of government letting local authorities dictate rail service routes)? Just hand the lot of it over to GBR and let's have a strategic outlook put in place rather than an extreme localist view.
david C smith, Bletchley
Yes, TfL and Merseyrail are two examples of succesful local public sector operations, catering to short distance travel wthin a "City region", and I hope such can be constituted in a framework of direct democracy.
But I strongly suspect that Inter City type services that cross City Region boundaries will perform best if provided by competing private sector companies.
John B, London
Unless devolved authorities are given proper budgets along the lines of the multi-year funding settlements agreed between the DfT and TfL, their requests for development of the network risk being little more than letters to Santa.